Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
University of the Arts London

Cybermedia literacy in communication design education

Abstract

Communications design students today have grown up ‘digital' and for many, interactions with cyberspace begin in early childhood. By arguing for more attention to be paid to the intersection of youth design identity formation and digital media in the field of communications design, this provocation piece argues for there to be a greater focus upon this intersection in teaching. Technology change issues – such as career identity development and interdisciplinary design studies – are considered in relation to identity formation. Given that these topics have in recent years become more prominent, there is thus an argument for moving beyond previous conception of design students’ experiences in order to prepare them for their careers, not only when first entering the field but in ways that allow them to continue to adapt and grow as professionals.

Keywords

Communications Design, Design Education, Identity formation, Technology Use

HTML PDF

Author Biography

Laura Scherling

Doctoral Student, Teachers College, Columbia University

Senior Designer | laurascherling.info 

 


References

  1. American Institute of Graphic Arts, AIGA (2015) ‘Designer of 2015 competencies’, AIGA: The Professional Association for Design. Available at: http://www.aiga.org/designer-of-2015-competencies (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  2. Burton, J.M. (2011) Creative and mental growth revisited. Unpublished manuscript.
  3. Carr, N.G. (2010) The shallows: what the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  4. Chung, S.K. (2011) ‘Cybermedia literacy art education’ in Sweeny, R.W. (ed.) Inter/actions/inter/sections: art education in a digital visual culture. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association, pp.146–157.
  5. College Board (2017) ‘60 career areas’, AP Studio Art: 2D Design, Course Overview. Available at: https://apstudent.collegeboard.org/apcourse/ap-studio-art-2-d-design (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  6. Crook, C. (2012) ‘The ‘digital native’ in context: tensions associated with importing web 2.0 practices into the school setting’, Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), pp.63–80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577946.
  7. Design Council (2010) Multi-disciplinary design education in the UK: report and recommendations from the multi-disciplinary design network. London: Design Council, HEFCE, NESTA. Available at: http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/multi-disciplinary-design-education.pdf (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  8. Efland, A.D. (1990) A history of art education: intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts. New York: Teachers College Press.
  9. Efland, A.D. (2002) Art and cognition: integrating the visual arts in the curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
  10. Erikson, E.H. (1995) Identity: youth, and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  11. Gardner, H. and Davis, K. (2013) The app generation: how today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  12. Jury, D. (2012) Graphic design before graphic designers: the printer as designer and craftsman 1700–1914. New York: Bloomsbury USA Academic.
  13. Kroger, J. (2007) Identity development: adolescence through adulthood. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  14. Lenhart, A. (2015) ‘Teens, social media and technology overview 2015’, Pew Research Centre, 9 April. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015 (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  15. McCreery, M.P., Krach, S.K., Schrader, P.G. and Boone, R. (2012) ‘Defining the virtual self: personality, behavior, and the psychology of embodiment’, Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), pp.976–983. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.019.
  16. Meyrowitz, J. (2005) ‘The rise of glocality: new senses of place and identity in the global village’ in Nyíri, K. (ed.) A sense of place: the global and local in mobile communication. Wien: Passagen Verlag, pp.21–30. Available at: http://www.mta.t-mobile.mpt.bme.hu/dok/8_Meyrowitz.pdf (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  17. Ofcom (2016) Adults’ media use and attitudes. Available at: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0026/80828/2016-adults-media-use-and-attitudes.pdf (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  18. Perrin, A. and Duggan, M. (2015) ‘Americans’ internet access: 2000–2015’, Pew Research Centre, 26 June. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015 (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  19. Prensky, M.R. (2012) From digital natives to digital wisdom: hopeful essays for 21st century learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  20. Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G. and Roberts, D.F. (2010) Generation m2: media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Available at: https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/8010.pdf (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  21. STEM to STEAM (2017) What is STEAM?. Available at: http://stemtosteam.org/ (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  22. Sweeny, R.W. (2011) Inter/actions/inter/sections: art education in a digital visual culture. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
  23. Turkle, S. (2015) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
  24. UN News Centre (2016) ‘Nearly 47 per cent of global population now online - UN Report’, 15 September. Available at: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=54931#.WLTjmBIrKV4 (Accessed: 8 March 2017).
  25. Whittier, D.B. (2013) ‘Cyberethics: envisioning character education in cyberspace’, Peabody Journal of Education, 88(2), pp.225–242. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2013.775882.