When art and design students and lecturers co-habit any kind of space, many relationships and interactions occur, only some of which are even loosely connected with learning and teaching. Do the activities which unfold in a studio or classroom define the space as a place for exploration, or do they imply a blocking of personal learning journeys? Specifically, if the psychogeography (Debord, 1955) of the learning space reproduces a hierarchical power relationship, can this be compatible with student-centred pedagogies and enquiry-based learning?
Learning Spaces, Psychogeography, Enquiry-based Learning
Dr Silke Lange
Dr. Silke Lange is Associate Dean of Learning, Teaching and Enhancement at Central Saint Martins. Silke’s research encompasses the creative process, collaborative learning, interdisciplinarity, learning environments and the student as co-creator. She has been involved in projects such as the ‘Innovators Grant 2015’ at the Node Centre in Berlin and Broad Vision, an interdisciplinary art / science research and learning programme. Her recent investigations into learning environments have been published in an international anthology on Learning Space Design as a co-authored chapter entitled: Promoting Collaborative and Interdisciplinary Learning via Migration between different Learning Spaces.
Richard Reynolds completed his Masters in Anglo-American Studies at Oxford University in 1982. From 1983 to 2010 he worked in the publishing industry, and served as Managing Director of Reynolds & Hearn Ltd from 1999 to 2010. Richard has taught at Central Saint Martins since 1994, and has been Joint Head of Academic Support at CSM since 2013. He is also Course Leader for MA Applied Imagination in the Creative Industries. His best-known published work is Superheroes: A Modern Mythology (Batsford 1992, Mississippi 1994).
David White is Head of Digital Learning in the Teaching and Learning Exchange at UAL. He researches online learning practices in both informal and formal contexts. David has led and been an expert consultant on numerous studies around the use of technology for learning in the UK higher education sector and is the originator of the ‘Visitors and Residents’ paradigm, which describes how individuals engage with the Web.
- Benedict, M.E. and Hoag, J. (2004) ‘Seating location in large lectures: are seating preferences or location related to course performance?’, The Journal of Economic Education, 35(3), pp. 215-231.
- Boys, J. (2011) Towards creative learning spaces: rethinking the architecture of post-compulsory education. London: Routledge.
- Debord, G. (1955) ‘Introduction to a critique of urban geography’, in Knabb, K. (ed.) Situationist International Anthology. Oakland: Bureau of Public Secrets.
- Dineen, R. (2006) ‘Views from the chalk face: lecturers’ and students’ perspectives on the development of creativity in art and design’ in Jackson, N., Oliver, M., Shaw, M. and Wisdom, J. (eds.) Developing creativity in higher education: an imaginative curriculum. London: Routledge. pp. 109-117.
- Gossard, M., Jessup, E. & Casavant, K. (2006) ‘Anatomy of a classroom: An exploratory analysis of elements influencing academic performance’, North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Journal, 50(2), pp. 36-39.
- Holliman, W.B. and Anderson, H.N. (1986) ‘Proximity and student density as ecological variables in a college classroom’, Teaching of Psychology, 13(4), pp. 200-203, http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1304_7.
- Horne Martin, S. (2004) ‘Environment behaviour studies in the classroom’, Journal of Design and Technology Education, 9(2), pp. 77-89.
- Kalinowski, S. and Taper, M.L. (2007) ‘The effect of seat location on exam grades and student perceptions in an introductory biology class’, Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(4), pp. 54-57.
- Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- MacPhee, L. (2009) ‘Learning spaces: a tutorial’, Educause Quarterly Magazine, 32(1). Available at: http://er.educause.edu/articles/2009/3/learning-spaces-a-tutorial (Accessed 8 June 2016).
- Mehan, H. (1979) Learning lessons: social organization of the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Owen, H. (2008) Open Space Technology: a user’s guide. 3rd edn. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
- Pedersen, D.M. (1994) ‘Privacy preferences and classroom seat selection’, Social Behaviour and Personality: an international journal, 22(4), pp. 393-398.
- Race, P. (2001) The lecturer’s toolkit. 2nd edn. London: Kogan Page.
- Reynolds, R. (forthcoming 2016) ‘Psycho-geography and its relevance to inclusive teaching and learning development: why it matters where students choose to sit’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 10.
- Seifert, K. & Sutton, R. (2007) Contemporary educational psychology. Wikibooks. Available at: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Contemporary_Educational_Psychology (Accessed: 7 June 2016).
- Stehle, M. (2008) ‘Psychogeography as teaching tool: troubled travels through an experimental first-year seminar’, InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 4(2). Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3xv3634r (Accessed 8 July 2016)
- Strickland, A. (2014) ‘The active agency of learning spaces’, in Scott-Webber, L., Branch, J., Bartholomew, P. and Nygaard, C. (eds.) Learning Space Design in Higher Education. Oxfordshire: LIBRI Publishing, pp. 209-224.
- Temple, P. (2007) Learning spaces for the 21st century: a review of the literature. London: Centre for Higher Education Studies, Institute of Education, University of London. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/learning_spaces_v3.pdf (Accessed: 8 June 2016).
- Totusek, P.F. and Staton-Spicer, A.Q. (1982) ‘Classroom seating preference as a function of student personality’, Journal of Experimental Education, 50(3), pp. 159-163, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1982.11011818.
- Wulf, K.M. (1977) ‘Relationship of assigned classroom seating area to achievement variables’, Educational Research Quarterly, 2(2), pp. 56-62.